1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 1960 Trabant Universal
To start off, 1960 Trabant Universal is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 2200 (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1960 Trabant Universal. (20 HP @ 3900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1960 Trabant Universal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1960 Trabant Universal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Trabant Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 2200 | 1960 Trabant Universal | |
| Make | Abarth | Trabant |
| Model | 2200 | Universal |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 20 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2030 mm |
