1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 1962 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 1962 Jaguar MK II is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 120 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 362 kg more than 1959 Abarth 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 2200 | 1962 Jaguar MK II | |
Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
Model | 2200 | MK II |
Year Released | 1959 | 1962 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1452 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2900 mm |