1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 1963 BMW 3200 CS
To start off, 1963 BMW 3200 CS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 3200 CS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 BMW 3200 CS (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 2200. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 BMW 3200 CS should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 3200 CS weights approximately 410 kg more than 1959 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 2200 | 1963 BMW 3200 CS | |
| Make | Abarth | BMW |
| Model | 2200 | 3200 CS |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 3169 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 186 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2840 mm |
