1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 1963 DKW F 11
To start off, 1963 DKW F 11 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,161 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 2200 (135 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 2200 | 1963 DKW F 11 | |
| Make | Abarth | DKW |
| Model | 2200 | F 11 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2161 cc | 889 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 7.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 31 L |
