1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1965 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 2200. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1025 kg more than 1959 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 2200 | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 2200 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3390 mm |
