1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 1968 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1968 Holden Belmont is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 2200 (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 200 kg more than 1959 Abarth 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 2200 | 1968 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Abarth | Holden |
Model | 2200 | Belmont |
Year Released | 1959 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 3043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2830 mm |