1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 1969 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1969 Triumph 2000 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 2200 (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1969 Triumph 2000. (90 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1959 Abarth 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 2200 | 1969 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Abarth | Triumph |
| Model | 2200 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Top Speed | 186 km/hour | 154 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |
