1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 2200. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 2200 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Abarth | Caterham |
| Model | 2200 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 186 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2260 mm |
