1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 1998 Citroen ZX
To start off, 1998 Citroen ZX is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,161 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 2200 (135 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1998 Citroen ZX. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1998 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Abarth 2200 (187 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen ZX. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1959 Abarth 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 2200 | 1998 Citroen ZX | |
Make | Abarth | Citroen |
Model | 2200 | ZX |
Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2161 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 187 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1460 mm |