1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 2200. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 2200.
Because 1959 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile SS has automatic transmission and 1959 Abarth 2200 has manual transmission. 1959 Abarth 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile SS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 2200 | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Abarth | Oldsmobile |
Model | 2200 | SS |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1900 mm |