1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 2000 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2000 Smart Roadster is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 2200 (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Smart Roadster. (101 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 2200 | 2000 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | 2200 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 186 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2370 mm |