1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 2003 Ford Puma
To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,161 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 2200 (135 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2003 Ford Puma. (99 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 22 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Abarth 2200 (187 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Puma. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1959 Abarth 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 2200 | 2003 Ford Puma | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 2200 | Puma |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2161 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1038 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |