1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 2003 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2003 Skoda Fabia is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 2200 (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2003 Skoda Fabia. (74 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 2003 Skoda Fabia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Skoda Fabia weights approximately 40 kg more than 1959 Abarth 2200.
Because 1959 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 2200 | 2003 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Abarth | Skoda |
Model | 2200 | Fabia |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 19.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2470 mm |