1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 2200. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 674 kg more than 1959 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 2200 | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Abarth | Jeep |
| Model | 2200 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 195 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1764 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |
