1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 2008 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 2200. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 655 kg more than 1959 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 2200 | 2008 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 2200 | CTS |
Year Released | 1959 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 5664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 395 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 186 km/hour | 274 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2890 mm |