1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,161 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1959 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Abarth 2200 (187 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1959 Abarth 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 2200 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 2200 | Clio |
Year Released | 1959 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2161 cc | 1149 cc |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 187 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |