1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 944 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 2200. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR weights approximately 190 kg more than 1959 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 2200 | 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
Make | Abarth | Koenigsegg |
Model | 2200 | CCXR |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 1064 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Top Speed | 186 km/hour | 400 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2660 mm |