1959 Abarth 2200 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 2200 would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1959 Abarth 2200 has manual transmission. 1959 Abarth 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 2200 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | 2200 | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 1867 mm |