1959 Abarth 600 vs. 2001 Cadillac LMP
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 600 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 259 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 600. (41 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Abarth 600. (54 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Abarth 600. 2001 Cadillac LMP has automatic transmission and 1959 Abarth 600 has manual transmission. 1959 Abarth 600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Cadillac LMP will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 600 | 2001 Cadillac LMP | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 600 | LMP |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 401 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 1 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3090 mm |
