1959 Abarth 850 vs. 1966 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1966 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 850 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth 850 (70 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1966 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth 850 should accelerate faster than 1966 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1959 Abarth 850.
Because 1966 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Abarth 850. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Abarth 850. (80 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1966 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Abarth 850.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 850 | 1966 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 850 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3480 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2060 mm |