1959 Abarth 850 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 850 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 850. (70 HP @ 6800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 850.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Abarth 850. (80 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Abarth 850.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 850 | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | 850 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3480 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 65 L |