1959 Abarth Renault vs. 1951 Austin A 40
To start off, 1959 Abarth Renault is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Abarth Renault is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth Renault (109 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth Renault should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 40 weights approximately 79 kg more than 1959 Abarth Renault.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth Renault | 1951 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | Renault | A 40 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 891 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 48 L |