1959 Abarth Renault vs. 1963 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1963 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth Renault. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth Renault would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1959 Abarth Renault. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth Renault. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1251 kg more than 1959 Abarth Renault. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth Renault | 1963 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | Renault | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 891 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2050 mm |
