1959 Abarth Renault vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1967 Riley Kestrel is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth Renault. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth Renault would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Abarth Renault is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Abarth Renault (109 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Abarth Renault should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 24 kg more than 1959 Abarth Renault.
Because 1959 Abarth Renault is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth Renault. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth Renault | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Abarth | Riley |
Model | Renault | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1959 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 891 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2380 mm |