1959 Abarth Renault vs. 2004 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth Renault. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth Renault would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1959 Abarth Renault. (109 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth Renault. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1434 kg more than 1959 Abarth Renault. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth Renault | 2004 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | Renault | Econoline |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 891 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3510 mm |