1959 AC Ace vs. 1980 Audi 200
To start off, 1980 Audi 200 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1980 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Audi 200 (170 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1959 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Audi 200 weights approximately 376 kg more than 1959 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Ace | 1980 Audi 200 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Ace | 200 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 75 L |