1959 AC Ace vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Ace (74 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 AC Ace weights approximately 25 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Ace | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | AC | Nissan |
| Model | Ace | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2420 mm |
