1959 AC Ace vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1982 Seat Ronda is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Seat Ronda (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1959 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Seat Ronda weights approximately 46 kg more than 1959 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Ace | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
Make | AC | Seat |
Model | Ace | Ronda |
Year Released | 1959 | 1982 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2460 mm |