1959 AC Ace vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Ace would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econoline (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1959 AC Ace. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1431 kg more than 1959 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Ace | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Ace | Econoline |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Body Type | Roadster | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3510 mm |