1959 AC Ace vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Ace (74 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 AC Ace weights approximately 150 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Ace | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | AC | MCC |
Model | Ace | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 1810 mm |