1959 AC Ace vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,375 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1959 AC Ace. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 993 kg more than 1959 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Ace | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Ace | Tundra |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1887 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 100 L |