1959 AC Ace vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Ace (125 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 AC Ace weights approximately 150 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 AC Ace (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1959 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Ace | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | AC | MCC |
| Model | Ace | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 1810 mm |
