1959 AC Ace vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Ace (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star. (102 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star weights approximately 456 kg more than 1959 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star (220 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Ace | 2005 Mitsubishi Space Star | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ace | Space Star |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 19.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |