1959 AC Ace vs. 2007 Chevrolet Evanda

To start off, 2007 Chevrolet Evanda is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Chevrolet Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chevrolet Evanda (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1959 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Evanda should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chevrolet Evanda weights approximately 607 kg more than 1959 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

1959 AC Ace 2007 Chevrolet Evanda
Make AC Chevrolet
Model Ace Evanda
Year Released 1959 2007
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 119 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 890 kg 1497 kg
Vehicle Length 3850 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 65 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]