1959 AC Ace vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (139 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1959 AC Ace. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 634 kg more than 1959 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (176 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Ace | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Ace | Orlando |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1528 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2760 mm |