1959 AC Ace vs. 2011 Mercury Mariner

To start off, 2011 Mercury Mariner is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercury Mariner (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1959 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 625 kg more than 1959 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

1959 AC Ace 2011 Mercury Mariner
Make AC Mercury
Model Ace Mariner
Year Released 1959 2011
Body Type Roadster SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 171 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 890 kg 1515 kg
Vehicle Length 3850 mm 4458 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1806 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1778 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2619 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 62 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]