1959 AC Ace vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 210 more horse power than 1959 AC Ace. (125 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Ace | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Ace | RS3 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |