1959 AC Ace vs. 2012 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2012 Toyota Tundra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Ace would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 1959 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 442 kg more than 1959 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Ace | 2012 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Ace | Tundra |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1332 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 100 L |