1959 AC Aceca vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1959 AC Aceca is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Aceca (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. (72 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 AC Aceca weights approximately 470 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Aceca | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
Make | AC | Simca |
Model | Aceca | Type 11 Monoplace |
Year Released | 1959 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2250 mm |