1959 AC Aceca vs. 1963 AC Greyhound
To start off, 1963 AC Greyhound is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Greyhound weights approximately 125 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Aceca | 1963 AC Greyhound | |
Make | AC | AC |
Model | Aceca | Greyhound |
Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 54 L |