1959 AC Aceca vs. 1964 Austin Princess
To start off, 1964 Austin Princess is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin Princess (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Aceca | 1964 Austin Princess | |
Make | AC | Austin |
Model | Aceca | Princess |
Year Released | 1959 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 72 L |