1959 AC Aceca vs. 1972 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1972 Mercury Comet is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mercury Comet (82 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mercury Comet weights approximately 330 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Aceca | 1972 Mercury Comet | |
Make | AC | Mercury |
Model | Aceca | Comet |
Year Released | 1959 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2800 mm |