1959 AC Aceca vs. 1976 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1976 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 AC Aceca weights approximately 40 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Aceca | 1976 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | AC | Mazda |
| Model | Aceca | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 65 L |
