1959 AC Aceca vs. 1988 Mazda 626

To start off, 1988 Mazda 626 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Mazda 626 (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Mazda 626 weights approximately 232 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1959 AC Aceca 1988 Mazda 626
Make AC Mazda
Model Aceca 626
Year Released 1959 1988
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 1789 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 890 kg 1122 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2580 mm