1959 AC Aceca vs. 1999 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1999 Mazda Midge is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 AC Aceca (123 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1999 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda Midge weights approximately 72 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca.
Because 1959 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 AC Aceca (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1959 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Aceca | 1999 Mazda Midge | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Aceca | Midge |
Year Released | 1959 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |