1959 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 392 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 910 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Aceca | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
| Make | AC | Jaguar |
| Model | Aceca | XKA |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 466 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2590 mm |
