1959 AC Aceca vs. 2003 Avanti Studebaker
To start off, 2003 Avanti Studebaker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,751 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Avanti Studebaker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Avanti Studebaker (306 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Avanti Studebaker should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Avanti Studebaker weights approximately 1885 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Avanti Studebaker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Avanti Studebaker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Aceca | 2003 Avanti Studebaker | |
Make | AC | Avanti |
Model | Aceca | Studebaker |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6751 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3410 mm |