1959 AC Aceca vs. 2003 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2003 GMC Sierra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 GMC Sierra (321 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1380 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Aceca | 2003 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | AC | GMC |
| Model | Aceca | Sierra |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 117 L |
