1959 AC Aceca vs. 2005 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 226 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1943 kg more than 1959 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 AC Aceca | 2005 GMC Sierra | |
Make | AC | GMC |
Model | Aceca | Sierra |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 300 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2833 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 6510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1970 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 4250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 132 L |