1959 AC Aceca vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1959 AC Aceca. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1959 AC Aceca.
Because 1959 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 AC Aceca | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | AC | Holden |
| Model | Aceca | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 139 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2685 mm |
